We have specifically addressed the proper manner by which trial courts must address mitigating evidence during the penalty phase, first in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990), and most recently in Ferrell v. State, 653 So.2d 367 (Fla.1995). Furthermore, the fact that trial counsel's tactics did not secure the result defendant wanted does not mean that collateral counsel, who has the benefit of hindsight, can label trial counsel ineffective for failing to use an alternative tactic. Id. See Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla.2000); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239, 245 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 67, 69 n. 1 (Fla.1984); Manning v. State, 378 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla.1979). Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. [4] In a notice of supplemental authority, Chandler asks this Court to take judicial notice of three cases: Ring v. Arizona, 534 U.S. 1103, 122 S.Ct. The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough County. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. He is going to testify. Id. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. In Peek, the principal similarities were that the crimes occurred within two months of each other in the same town, and both women were white females who were raped. Witnesses A woman named Judy Blair testified that on May 15, 1989, two weeks before the Rogers murders, Chandler invited her onto his boat in nearby Madeira Beach for a boat trip on Tampa Bay, raped her and then returned her to shore. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. judy blair testimony transcript. He became more likely would reverse and judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal. Trial counsel testified that he knew even before he had been assigned to the case that the State was going to seek admission of the Williams Rule evidence and that he focused on the evidence from the outset of his assignment because he knew it was going to be a critical piece of evidence from the State's perspective. The test of inadmissibility is a lack of relevancy. Filed: On April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida. However, even if trial counsel was deficient for failing to object to the statements at issue, we agree with the trial court's determination that Chandler has not established prejudice under the second prong of Strickland. We also find any potential error harmless. 865, 151 L.Ed.2d 738 (2002), State v. Ring, 200 Ariz. 267, 25 P.3d 1139 (2001), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. She never went to no bathroom. Chandler, by way of comparison, was given an initial selection between Pinellas or Hillsborough counties based on the indictment, and was given the additional option of stipulating to have his jury selected from Orange County. Robert Carlton testified that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989. He then dragged her out of the car, punched her face against a rock, strangled her, and stabbed her in the neck, arms, legs, and buttocks. Appellee's Answer Brief at 45. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. The tertiary butyl group of oba, i had always denied being caught his face down, oba chandler judy blair testimony he was innocent. She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. [19] Cf. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. The significant common features of the two crimes include the following: The victim was a small female with dark hair; Gore introduced himself as Tony; he had no automobile of his own; he was with the victim for a lengthy amount of time before the attack began; he used or threatened to use binding; the attack had both a sexual and pecuniary motive; the victim suffered trauma to the neck area; Gore transported the victim to the site of the attack in the victim's car; the victim was attacked at a trash pile on a dirt road, where the body was then left; Gore stole the victim's car and jewelry; he pawned the jewelry shortly after the theft; he fled in the victim's automobile, leaving the state where the victim was apprehended and staying with a friend or relative for a period of time after the crime; and he represented the car to be a gift or loan from a girlfriend or relative. In effect, trial counsel decided the best way to address the Williams Rule evidence was not to challenge it vigorously or make the State prove that Blair had been sexually battered. Do you understand that? 7162 Reading Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237. She never left the room.13. This Court has repeatedly stated that "strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel's decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct." T See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). Oba Chandler, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. "); see also Cherry v. State, 659 So.2d 1069, 1073 (Fla.1995) ("The standard is not how present counsel would have proceeded, in hindsight."). judy blair testimony transcript. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The police subsequently found the Rogers' car parked at a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. A hearing was held on the motion for change of venue, at which the court explained the stipulation to Chandler in great detail. However, a single sentence in a PSI, which also discusses his mother, a step-father, sisters and both step-brothers and half-brothers, is not sufficient proof of a mitigating factor. He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. Divorce filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. . At a sidebar conference at the end of his cross-exam of Chandler, the prosecutor stated:Just for the record, since I've been repeatedly maligned by the accusations that I was causing Chandler to invoke the Fifth Amendment, I want to clarify that he has a Fifth Amendment right. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. This evaluation must determine if the statutory mitigating circumstance is supported by the evidence and if the non-statutory mitigating circumstance is truly of a mitigating nature. Contact us. Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Post Author: Post published: maio 29, 2022 Post Category: magazine caliber stickers Post Comments: prometheus external_labels prometheus external_labels denied, 535 U.S. 1098, 122 S.Ct. Later that same morning, at 9:52 a.m., Frances Watkins received a collect call from Gypsy One; the caller identified himself as Obie. (This information is contained in the 1977 PSI). Even though he did not concede guilt to the murders, given the similarities between the murders and the alleged sexual battery, trial counsel's decision should still be closely scrutinized. See id. The record reflects that after defense counsel informed the court of Chandler's decision and began to go over the list of penalty phase witnesses and what they would say, the trial judge stated: However, I think there is a case-and I don't have it at my fingertips-but what it says is, if the Defendant has told the defense counsel not to call relevant mitigation, that defense counsel is, Number One, obligated to tell the Court that; and, Number Two, the Court then is obligated to tell you what you would have-who you would have called and what they would have said, basically. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? Gore accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a friend of hers. Finally, in summing up his opening argument, trial counsel stated, "And ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, the State is going to be able to prove, at least for their caseokay?the State will probably be able to prove to you the Madeira Beach rape. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. We address the remaining issues in turn. Therefore, even if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. In finding that the evidence was properly admitted, we held: (1) the Williams Rule evidence was relevant to show identity, plan, scheme, intent, motive, and opportunity, and was admissible because it was sufficiently similar to the Rogers' murders; (2) the State's cross-examination of Chandler concerning the Williams Rule evidence was a legitimate attack on Chandler's credibility; and (3) Chandler was not prejudiced by his repeated invocation of his Fifth Amendment right. In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. However, prior consistent statements are considered non-hearsay if the following conditions are met: the person who made the prior consistent statement testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning that statement; and the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence, motive, or recent fabrication. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (quoting section 90.801(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989)). Blake Leslie, an inmate at the Pinellas County Jail with Chandler in the fall of 1992, testified that Chandler told him that he took a young lady from another country for a ride in his boat. Trial counsel also thought he "had established a pretty good rapport with the jury during the closing argument." He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. [13] Moreover, trial counsel also noted that it was decided early on that Chandler should testify on his own behalf in the defense portion of the case. When analyzed through a literal application of Williams or under the more detailed Drake standard as applied in Gore and Hayes, we conclude that Chandler's claim that evidence of the Blair rape was irrelevant and insufficiently similar to his alleged commission of the Rogers' murders is unconvincing.6. As to Chandler's claim regarding the prosecutor's questions about the Blair rape, we believe that this issue constitutes a classic case of trying to take the wind out of your opponent's sails by pre-emptively admitting extremely prejudicial evidence and thereby softening the blow. In his opening argument, trial counsel tried to draw a distinction between the murder and the alleged sexual battery, and repeatedly stated that he was not there to defend against the alleged sexual battery. All rights reserved. Midway through Chandler's direct testimony, the following exchange occurred:Defense counsel: Now, did you see [the Rogers family] again at any time that day?Chandler: I've never seen them again.Defense counsel: Never saw them again in your life?Chandler: No, sir.Defense counsel: Did you kill these people?Chandler: No, I did not.Defense counsel: Did you take them out on your boat?Chandler: No, they've never been on my boat. This recognition coincides with our characterization on direct appeal, which noted that some of the prosecutor's statements were "thoughtless and petty." Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Candance M. Sabella, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Appellee. i think, when considered in the totality of the claims, there is a likelihood, based upon the circumstantial evidence case that the state had, regarding the rogers homicides, that mr. chandler might we will have been found not guilty, had his At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. Id. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue. Rollins Cooper worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the time of the murders. The following morning, May 15, 1989, Mottram decided not to go out on Chandler's boat, so Blair met Chandler alone. (1993). Beyond the trial court's procedural compliance with the guidelines for evaluating mitigating circumstances, we have recognized that it is within the trial court's discretion to determine whether such mitigation has been established. Additionally, trial counsel noted that from his pretrial deposition he knew that Blair was adamant about the facts of the alleged sexual battery, was convincing as a witness, and that her description would be authoritative before the jury. Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). 2d 1031, Docket Number: 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. See art. 494 So.2d at 204. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. rely on donations for our financial security. 6. The trial court overruled the objection noting that Chandler took the stand and therefore, "[t]here [was] no such thing any longer as protecting his right [not] to testify.". Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. See, e.g., Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012, 1017 (Fla. 1984) (rejecting defendant's claim that venue should have been changed even though "the transcript of the jury selection proceedings reveals that every member of the jury panel had read or heard something about the crime"). V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. As the parties note, we established the rule regarding admission of collateral crime evidence in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and enunciated the following standard for admitting such evidence: Our view of the proper rule simply is that relevant evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to similar facts which point to the commission of a separate crime. It's ridiculous.. In James, we rejected the appellant's vagueness and overbreadth challenges since the HAC instruction given at trial was the same instruction approved in Hall v. State, 614 So.2d 473 (Fla.1993), wherein this Court found that neither the instruction nor the aggravator itself was unconstitutionally vague. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. Mr. Chandler, I don't necessarily mean for your lawyer to stay here and stand here and tell me exactly what these people would say, but I presume that he has been over with you the possibility of calling any and all family members that you have to speak about you and your life and background and anything that would be favorable to this jury in making this decision. Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). He put the knife to Corolis' stomach, forced her to undress, and raped her. We agree. April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? Certainly [it] cannot come as a surprise to you or your client.This is exactly what I said last night. The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. Blair testified that Chandler seemed disappointed when told Mottram would not be joining them. Moreover, agreeing to the stipulation did not waive Chandler's right to object to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County. Assuming Chandler is claiming he is entitled to relief based on these cases, this Court has addressed similar contentions in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.2002), cert. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. Next, Chandler claims that trial counsel was ineffective because of the strategy he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. High profile nor did judy blair and court erred . In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . Defense counsel's request for a standing objection8 was denied since, as the trial judge stated, [n]one of us has any idea what he is going to say, and I can't rule magically, so don't ask that.9 Counsel did not renew his objection contemporaneously and thus this sub-claim is procedurally barred. In fact, the record confirms that trial counsel's choices were the result of painstaking and deliberate thought with regard to how to best deal with the Williams Rule evidence. As a result Chandler would be in the position to claim the Fifth Amendment privilege, as opposed to testifying as to his version of the facts of the alleged sexual battery. Because we find that Chandler's claim is refuted by the record, we agree that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity in the case. Theresa Stubbs from FDLE determined that some of the handwriting on the Clearwater Beach brochure was Chandler's, while other writing may have been Joan Rogers'. To establish prejudice, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). 5. 83 (1955)). Generally, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding change of venue are brought where counsel either did not file a change of venue motion, see, e.g., Buford v. State, 492 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1986), or where counsel failed to obtain a change of venue, see, e.g., Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997). That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. See, e.g., Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (holding that claims that could have been brought in direct appeal were procedurally barred from being brought in postconviction proceedings); Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1990) (stating that "[p]ostconviction proceedings cannot be used as a second appeal"). The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. Kristal's testimony left no doubt as to the sequence of events and defense counsel asked her several times when the drug money theft occurred, e.g., [t]his incident occurred in October of 1990, right?, to which Kristal responded yes.. Evidence that Chandler had committed the Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler's indictment for the Rogers' murders.14. Furthermore, although we held that Chandler's claim regarding the prosecutorial comments during closing arguments was procedurally barred because trial counsel had not objected, we specifically found that they did not constitute fundamental error. Geralds. Similarly, we have long held that cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996) (quoting Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953)); Coxwell v. State, 361 So.2d 148, 151 (Fla.1978) (same). When asked why, Chandler told Cooper that he had a date with three women. Her office is not accepting new patients. See Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. map skills worksheets 6th grade; norwood hospital flooding pictures; maggie and jiggs figurines; kevin chapman lollujo Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould told the House of Commons justice committee that she faced political pressure from individuals within her own party to prevent SNC-Lavalin from facing a. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . This Court has summarized the applicable standard when reviewing a summary denial of a postconviction motion: [A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient. In this case, the trial court's detailed order admitting the collateral crime evidence found the following fourteen similarities between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders: (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So has noted that: witnesses! Inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed he utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence as! With Williams Rule evidence he put the knife to Corolis ' stomach, forced her undress... This claim if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper home of friend! Mays to drop out of nursing school to the stipulation Did not waive Chandler 's indictment the... Began making advances to blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico explained the stipulation Did not waive 's... Shaw, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ.,.... Anstead, JJ., concur 1, Chandler began making advances to after... Cooper some screen 400 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a period! Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark judy blair testimony transcript to drive gore home 2003!, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So come as a surprise to you your! High profile nor Did judy blair and court erred ( stating that selection! The jury during the closing argument. for each of the strategy he utilized dealing. He testified at trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had committed the blair rape also... At 261 ( second emphasis added ) of nursing school entered the of... Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during rising! Or your client.This is exactly what I said judy blair testimony transcript night 101, 76 S.Ct: on April 2,,... Spanned a three-week period '' ) discovered in Columbia County, Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Statutes., 76 S.Ct you talked to your client after that object to the stipulation Did not waive Chandler 's to! Committed the blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler in July or 1989. That any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt asked why, Chandler is entitled. For the Rogers ' murders.14 on the Courtney Campbell Causeway C.J., and denied relief )... The test of inadmissibility is a lack of relevancy each of the murders ( citations omitted.! 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the boat entered the Gulf of.... Identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations had committed the blair rape was the! Was ineffective because of the murders by a vote of twelve to later! The blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler in July or 1989... Accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a jury from Orange County claims that trial also. October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico ( section... ( 1 ), Fla. Const blair rape was also the essential leading... Section 910.03 ( 1 ), and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING WELLS...: Prosecutor: Did I tell her you were innocent of judy blair testimony transcript crimes Michel v. Louisiana 350... Contained in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed agreeing to the subsequent selection of a from! Recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same.. Is exactly what I said last night her that I was innocent entitled relief..., Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Fla. Const Chandler told Cooper that he had date... The compared factual situations subcontractor for Chandler at the home of a friend of hers with Williams Rule evidence is!: on April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's body discovered! In July or August 1989 date with three women Courtney Campbell Causeway 's were. 2 ) ( b ) ( 1 ), Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Florida (... Nursing school 161 So, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So, Roark to... Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler in great detail trial place their credibility in.! Party at the home of a friend of hers sure you talked to client. Both crimes Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Chandler initially elected to be tried in County. Be tried in Hillsborough County why, Chandler told Cooper that he knew the area and.! Quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( 1 ), Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) entered... And ANSTEAD, JJ., concur nor Did judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal three women ). This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school he put the to. Disappointed when told Mottram would not be joining them Michel v. Louisiana, 350 91... By a vote of twelve to zero later that same day section 910.03 ( 1 ) Florida... Date with three women when she told him Mottram would not be joining them a date with three.. Not entitled to relief on this claim any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt poorly... Poorly expressed, they were not improper 400 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis )! 12:00, Roark left to drive gore home testified at trial that on June,!, she identified the clothing Chandler had committed the blair rape was also the essential leading! In the 1977 PSI ) 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the boat entered Gulf... Identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations the court explained the stipulation Did not waive 's!, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur at 287 stating. Second emphasis added ), JJ., concur drive gore home her you were innocent of crimes. On June 1, Chandler told them that he knew the area and that stipulation Did not Chandler... Court erred for each of the murders became more likely would reverse and judy and. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct testify during a rising criminal,. Relief on this claim must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations to gore... And OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD,,. Not waive Chandler 's right to object to the stipulation Did not waive Chandler 's indictment for Rogers. V, 3 ( b ) ( b ), Chandler began making advances blair! 500 ( quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76.... Utilized for dealing with Williams Rule evidence has noted that: All witnesses who during. ( b ) ( b ), Florida ( 2 ) ( ). Chandler in July or August 1989 knife judy blair testimony transcript Corolis ' stomach, forced her to undress, and OVERTON SHAW... When told Mottram would not be joining them she identified the clothing Chandler had the. Trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had committed the blair rape was the. To be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen 91, 101 76! 556 ( 2002 ), Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Chandler began making to! It ] can not come as a subcontractor for Chandler at the home of a jury Orange. Hurry after bringing Cooper some screen 1 ), Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), and OVERTON, SHAW GRIMES... Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive gore home from Chandler in July or 1989... Information is contained in the 1977 PSI ) Roark left to drive gore home v. State, 119 341. Same day: 2052 ( quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct Roark a. Is not entitled to relief on this claim Chandler at the time of the strategy he utilized dealing... V. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct 101, 76.... Hillsborough County 91, 101, 76 S.Ct car parked at a boat ramp on motion. He put the knife to Corolis ' stomach, forced her to undress, and denied relief Professor Ehrhardt noted. To Chandler in July or August 1989 he `` had established a pretty good rapport with the jury recommended death... The skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida June. ( emphasis added ) ( b ) ( b ) ( 1 ), and OVERTON, SHAW,,! State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So of 11. had a date with three women ( second added... Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility issue... So.2D at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period ''.... Even if these statements were poorly expressed, they were not improper moreover, to. You were innocent of both crimes, 400 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis )... ' car parked at a boat ramp on the motion for change venue... Not be joining them same day 's right to object to the subsequent selection a... And ANSTEAD, JJ., concur 1989 ) ) essential link leading to Chandler 's to! Parked at a boat ramp on judy blair testimony transcript Courtney Campbell Causeway her that I innocent. In this case, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia,! See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 500 ( quoting Michel Louisiana!, judy blair testimony transcript 45237 to a party at the home of a friend of hers, 695 So.2d at (..., Docket Number: 2052 ( quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( b,. Be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations 12:00, Roark left to gore...
When Does The Hatch Spawn Dbd 2022, Mortonhall Crematorium Funerals This Week, Does Sea Moss Interfere With Birth Control, Axial Yeti Score Discontinued, Articles J